Spider-Man 2

The sequel to the story of Spider-Man surpassed its predecessor in many ways (especially in the technical aspects), equally great part. While I hesitated to give the first one a full rating and still ended up giving it 4 stars that were more like 4.5 stars (we'll see :), I have no problem with the second one. The main role here is played by Sam Raimi, who directed the sequel to his favorite comic book superhero perfectly and didn't allow any major gaffes that would have disturbed the brilliantly filmed story full of action, love, suspense, revenge, the desire for success... Raimi handles the alternating of the storylines with flying colors and I'm really looking forward to the third one, I've never seen the whole thing.) I'm just a bit worried about the reviews of "three" here, but we'll see.) Spider-Man 2 is definitely 5 stars, and a lot of the credit goes to Danny Elfman, as well as the greater space for character psychology. (24/08/2009)

A film I looked forward to seeing in the movie theater ten years ago. It definitely didn't disappoint me back then, and I fondly remember this trilogy in general. However, it's true that even though it was a big hit back then, over the past ten years it has somewhat worn out. It’s a classic big blockbuster that will now look best on television. The first installment did leave a bit more of an impression on me, even though I generally like Spider-Man, and Doc Ock looks simply great. (03/02/2014)

I was once so disappointed by Raimi's first Spider-Man that I decided to ignore the sequel. I found out today that the second part is better. Not by much, but it is. Thankfully, Sam Raimi at least got away from his specific style, which may have angered his loyal fans, but it did Spider-Man some good. Especially the action scenes are great this time, the special effects are more realistic, Dr. Octopus played by Alfredo Molina is a much better villain than Green Goblin, and the humor hasn't been forgotten... So it's not a bad film at all, although I remember almost nothing of it except after a few hours the aforementioned action scenes. It would have been even better with a different actor in the lead role or if Tobey Maguire hadn't taken off his mask at all. (12/05/2015)

Much better after a second screening. The things that bothered me before – the pathos taken to the extreme in places and the auntie's curmudgeonly proclamations – simply belong to the Spider-Man franchise, and if you accept Raimi's rules of the game, you'll be satisfied. What I admire most about Raimi's series is the perfect blend of Spider-man's human side – constant doubt, regret, unhappy love and, thanks to Tobey's looks, boyish goofiness – and the comic book superhuman side. Moreover, the unconventional beauty of Kirsten Dunst and the charisma of Tobey Maguire are always impressive. And Dr. Octopus is one hell of a villain, Alfred Molina gave him the necessary evil spark with his maniacal expression. With the passage of a few years, I have to admit that this is one of the most accomplished comic book adaptations. (16/09/2007)

Molina's supervillain is very much the lead here, pulling this sequel above the level of the first instalment in the form of a whiny Willem Dafoe hiding behind an ugly mask. Otherwise, Sam Raimi shows once again that he’s an excellent director with a story that is well put together, mixing humour with action in the best possible way. He also plays his cards right with the always likeable Maguire, the beautiful Kirsten Dunst and the mandatory great visual effects, thanks to which, especially in the spectacular ending, I didn't know where to turn my eyes. A beautiful example of a sequel that surpasses the first part, if only by a little. (21/07/2012)