Plots(1)

Boston, Massachusetts. Home of clam chowder, the Red Sox and Harvard. Home, too, to some of the roughest, toughest criminals ever to walk the streets. When the bungling McManus brothers, Conner (Sean Patrick Flanery) and Murphy (Norman Reedus), inadvertently end up taking out a pair of Russian Mafiosi, they realise they've found their calling and embark on a mission to cleanse their city of criminals, inspired by the tactics of on-screen vigilantes like Clint Eastwood and Charles Bronson. But their vigilante antics soon attract the attention of Paul Smecker (Willem Dafoe), an FBI agent with his own unique approach to fighting crime, setting the stage for an epic confrontation that will redefine the words truth and justice. (Arrow Films)

(more)

Reviews (11)

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English The story may limp along, you can easily mix up the supporting characters if you don't pay close enough attention, and I still haven't deciphered the final message years later (Satire? A warning? Both?), but I don't mind. The symphony of blood, action, and slow-motion shots contains almost everything a genre fan could wish for and pleasantly engages the viewer throughout. When I add Willem Dafoe's eccentric exhibitionism, any negative aspects are much harder to find. ()

agentmiky 

all reviews of this user

English This was a prime example of a treat. It’s such a shame that I never came across this film over the years because I really didn’t expect such a ride. Troy Duffy was a big unknown to me until now, but I now know he's a great director. He managed to create a film with minimal financial resources that boasts a charming lead duo, an amazing detective role by Dafoe (what he managed to portray, I truly didn't understand... I can only say bravo), and incredibly catchy Irish music, which really proves itself in films (like Kill the Irishman). The concept of removing bad people has likely appeared many times in history, but here it was handled in a refreshingly original way. Many might argue about the lack of action, but I disagree. It wasn’t that crucial (though the rope scene was definitely worth it, I can’t deny that). The film was primarily a perfect lesson in entertainment combined with the actors' impressive charisma, a smooth narrative, and spiced up with a few shootouts that even Tarantino would appreciate. It's just shy of five stars, but I might give it the highest score over time. 86%. ()

Ads

3DD!3 

all reviews of this user

English An inventive screenplay and direction from Duffy (the ingeniously written scene with the reconstruction of the shoot-out) that any would-be action director would have been proud of. Excellent acting performances both by the main two or the directing Willem Dafoe give the movie an inimitable atmosphere. I hope that Troy Duffy gets enough dough for part two so that the Saints can pull out all the stops again. And shepherds we shall be, for Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine Patris. Et Filii. Et Spiritus Sancti. ()

Othello 

all reviews of this user

English All things considered, the film fell far short of my expectations. I was expecting more gore, more violence, more action. The film practically works in that vein all the time. The characters don't spare the macho bullshit about exterminating the mafia and how they’re not messing around, and there are all of three such scenes. Likewise, when the bad guys pick up some uber-slasher from the prison to rip him one, the viewer is in for a hell of a shootout. And yet this takes place in such a way that the three characters are unable to properly shoot the opponent standing in front of them, who in turn is unable to take them down. In addition, the story is very strange, with a few absolutely incomprehensible interjections (Dafoe like fuck) and so on. Fortunately, the first half contains quite a few good lines, and Willie is really pouring it on. Otherwise, wasted potential. ()

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English Those were the days when they didn't know how to do comic book stuff yet. If it had the aesthetic of a darker Marvel or normal DC today, it could be a blast. But The Boondock Saints has a bit of a blowhard Ritchie and a bit of a whiny Tarantino, with some solid screenwriting in places, but nothing more. The few interesting moments cannot overcome the utter aesthetic chaos and confusing directorial style. I’d be interested in a remake, because the material does have potential. ()

Gallery (20)