A Haunting in Venice

  • USA A Haunting in Venice (more)
Trailer 1

Plots(1)

A Haunting in Venice is set in eerie, post-World War II Venice on All Hallows’ Eve and is a terrifying mystery featuring the return of the celebrated sleuth, Hercule Poirot. Now retired and living in self-imposed exile in the world’s most glamorous city, Poirot reluctantly attends a séance at a decaying, haunted palazzo. When one of the guests is murdered, the detective is thrust into a sinister world of shadows and secrets. (Walt Disney Nordic Fin.)

(more)

Videos (5)

Trailer 1

Reviews (10)

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English Kenneth Branagh continues with the same, generic whodunit that is a carbon copy of the previous one. Only instead of the sunny Nile Delta with its often overly digital Pyramids, we have mysterious Venice, specifically a gothic house full of strange sounds and untold secrets. Not a single moment is remarkable, not a single shot or sequence of events unpredictable. At least it is briskly told and with a few wannabe horror moments and a decent production design, and it also has a decent (meaning short) running time. ()

EvilPhoEniX 

all reviews of this user

English I stupidly gave it a chance again and it didn't work out, for the third time. Hercule Poirot for me is probably the most boring and least interesting detective of them all (for example comparing him to Sherlock it's 100 and 1). Again it is filmed and presented in a way that could have entertained my grandmother and grandfather, but for me, and I believe the younger generation. the film is hard to digest. This time the cast wasn't worth much either, which reflects the actors lack of interest in acting in this one. The whole film is very slow with no hint of suspense or atmosphere (no, I didn't see any horror elements here), the fact that it lacks momentum and drive is one thing, but the fact that I didn't enjoy the dialogues, story and characters is another. I didn’t guess the killer, but the final denouement did nothing for me, the final explanation is supposed to deliver a proper build-up (like in Saw), but it never happens. I really don't enjoy this style of detective stories without murders, where the whole movie is spent listening to people bored by Branagh. Delete, forget, honor. 4/10. ()

Ads

NinadeL 

all reviews of this user

English Kenneth Branagh's first Poirot installment, which isn't an adaptation of a well-known novel, tested the strength of his era for the first time. While Murder on the Orient Express and Death on the Nile sparked various debates because these cases always had multiple versions, "Hallowe'en Party" never belonged among notoriously famous novels. So far, there have only been two television adaptations - Hallowe'en Party (2010) and Meurtre à la kermesse (2014). The concept of a Halloween horror in the confined space of a Venetian palace is exquisite. Likewise, Poirot's interaction with the famous Ariadne Oliver is excellent. It's a great affair that practically instantly becomes an autumn classic. If Branagh continues with this, it would be ideal to choose another lesser-known case. However, it's potentially unfortunate to shift the entire thing into the post-war world (this film is set in 1947), thus closing off the opportunity to further develop Poirot's real interwar world. ()

J*A*S*M 

all reviews of this user

English Admittedly made for less money, but by a huge margin the best Poirot by Kenneth Branagh. Intimate, elegant, understated, atmospheric. Where the Orient Express and  the Nile are overwrought and digital of, the beautiful mysterious residence in Venice makes do with playful camera angles, and without any CGI gimmicks. The horror overlay a nice bonus, oddly enough it holds up throughout the film, it wasn't just a trailer attraction. ()

agentmiky 

all reviews of this user

English For me, this was quite a big disappointment. No, I haven’t seen Death on the Nile yet. However, I can compare this film to Murder on the Orient Express, and that one wins by a long shot. The idea of combining a classic detective story with horror elements seemed interesting on paper, but the result felt rather jarring. One wants to enjoy the intricate relationships and the murder investigation, but that’s hard to do when the film tries to scare you (and does so in a rather cheap way, even by horror standards). I also agree with the criticism that setting it in Venice was completely unnecessary. Why choose such a picturesque city when 90% of the plot takes place indoors? I don’t understand...On the other hand, Kenneth Branagh was excellent. I enjoy his eccentric take on Poirot (a similar example would be Craig’s Benoit Blanc from the Knives Out series). It’s extravagant but effective. As for the story with supernatural elements, I expected a more ingenious explanation. For a blockbuster, the ending felt rather lazy and poorly executed. What a shame. I give it a 5.5/10. ()

Gallery (38)