Directed by:
Brian HelgelandCinematography:
Ericson CoreComposer:
Chris BoardmanCast:
Mel Gibson, Gregg Henry, Maria Bello, David Paymer, Bill Duke, Deborah Kara Unger, John Glover, William Devane, Lucy Liu, Jack Conley, Kris Kristofferson (more)VOD (3)
Plots(1)
Porter (Mel Gibson) carries out a $140,000 heist with his partner Val Resnick (Gregg Henry) and wife, Lynn (Deborah Kara Unger), only for them to double-cross him, shooting Porter and leaving him for dead. Vowing revenge, a recovered Porter sets off in pursuit, but in so doing attracts the attention of corrupt cops Hicks (Bill Duke) and Leary (Jack Conley), who want the money for themselves. (Warner Bros. Home Entertainment)
(more)Videos (1)
Reviews (11)
I really didn’t expect this to be such a stylized hit. I usually associate Brian Helgeland with quality screenplays, but here he not only took on the director’s chair but also created an incredibly old-school detective film in every way. Mel Gibson fit the lead role perfectly; his character, Porter, took his quest for revenge (which is more principled than personal) perhaps a bit too seriously, ruthlessly eliminating one villain after another. However, he can’t be classified as a hero; rather, quite the opposite (he hardly smiles throughout the film, making him someone you’d prefer to stay on good terms with at all costs). The dark blue filter had a certain visual appeal; at times, I wondered if the film was inspired by a comic book. The film also doesn’t lack originality, offering a few carefully crafted plot twists that genuinely surprised me. By the end, it picked up considerable pace, with perfect one-liners escalating exponentially, and I’m simply amazed. In terms of the genre, few films can compete with it; such a stylish, dark noir crime film is a rare sight. I give it 87%.
()
The brutality suits noir-themed crime stories quite well. On a journey for revenge, Mel Gibson, as a tough guy with a steel gaze, loves a beautiful prostitute, seeks out a traitor, and encounters – uh – a sadistic dominatrix leading an Asian gang. I can't remember the last time I used that word, but Payback is a cool movie, with a perfect cold look, and some scenes are amazingly uncompromising in their brutality, but unfortunately, everything is always just tough, and throughout the whole time, I didn't experience any significant twist that would have affected me in any way. Brian Helgeland relies on stylish form, but the essence constantly eludes him.
()
When it premiered, I gave Payback 4 stars and I must admit with a certain blush that it charmed me in its own way - and I am not a fan of the genre or even Mel Gibson. It is a film made with ease and it is straightforward, simple, genre-pure, and a cool ride where the pace never slackens and the usual clichés are presented tastefully and with a pervasive sense of irony. On the other hand, as the years went by and I read the book, it impressed me much more with its darkness, complexity, and ambiguity. Besides, it is impossible not to notice how the film approaches the character of the violent, murderous, and thieving protagonist, presenting him to the viewer as a likable rascal. This story is hard to believe, and I left behind my teenage years when I would have identified with this portrayal a long time ago. Overall impression: 60%.
()
Genre-wise Payback is essentially an unclassifiable film. It doesn't have a classic plot, it doesn't distinguish between good and evil, and it also doesn't map out the actions of the main characters. Mel Gibson is a man of moral principles and that's where it ends, he can't be called either “good” or “bad”, and perhaps that's exactly what makes Payback such a stylish ride. Of course there is also a polished formal side (filters, sets, cinematography) and a few gems (sadomasochism, a parade of bosses, corrupt cops, etc.) that cannot be overlooked and are captivating matter what you think of them. The plot is basically banal, but everything works like a well-oiled machine. Brian Helgeland is damn well aware of the squalor of the material and doesn't give the viewer a chance to realize this fact, bombarding them with one stylized shot after another and with main characters so interesting that it's hard to believe.
()
A brilliantly built-up thriller with a pace that is simply unreal in the second half. And yet so little is enough... Just steal $140,000 (no, sorry, just $70,000) from Mel Gibson and you'll unleash the kind of carousel of murders, shootouts and badass one-liners that we only remember from the first Die Hard. Gibson shines in his role and enjoys it to the fullest, but the supporting characters are also given a memorable portrayal by the actors, whether I'm thinking of the bad guys Henry, Kristofferson and Coburn or the pretty sharp hooker Lucy Liu. Simple, straightforward, harsh – just the way it should be.
()
Ads