Escape from New York

Typical John Carpenter’s madness set in an insanely looking New York as big prison, with tasteless and uninspiring action scenes, and characters that look like they've just had a stroke. The whole thing looks like one big fetish flick. We have a boxing ring, pseudo-futuristic machines, the World Trade Center, where a glider can land, all of that crowned by a tough and taciturn hero played by Kurt Russell, whom everyone knows and nobody calls anything other than Snake. It's crazy nonsense, but entertaining at times. The script is practically nonexistent and the plot is also nothing special. The only thing that stands out is precisely the cheapness and wackiness of the whole project, which is basically Carpenter's main weapon to impress the audience. (13/07/2006)

A typical, distinctive Carpenter film, as only he can do it. The low budget and the associated minimalism are enough to play a solid B-movie etude about one tough guy who stood up to everyone and fucked them all up... Kurt Russell is a man par excellence, who needs little to satisfy similarly-minded fans - the pissed-off face, synth music, and an hour and a half-long sequence of tense scenes that can be described in several pages of genre textbooks today. 4 ½. (16/05/2008)

Carpenter’s famous cult movie didn’t work on me. The atmosphere is fine, Russell is tough as nails, but the very premise of Manhattan as a prison (that was set up god knows why) is very silly. I know looking for logic in films of this kind is nonsense, but in Escape from New York all those inconsistencies were way too evident. (07/07/2011)

I like John Carpenter, but I've found that I haven't seen some quite significant films he directed - and there are quite a few of them. Yes, this was one of them. I was expecting it to be a bit crazier, but I definitely wasn't disappointed. There are excellent characters here, but above all, the environment is beautifully brutal. Man evolves long enough to eventually become this. Well, we couldn't be surprised, even though the year 1997 is successfully behind us. (20/03/2015)

I understand that with a film that's 38 years old, I can't set my expectations too high, but I was still quite disappointed. I’m a big fan of Carpenter as a director; I will never stop praising The Thing, but this one didn’t quite meet expectations. The idea of a prison on Manhattan appealed to me; it had something to it, and I could overlook the plot element of rescuing the American president as the main focus of the story. Yes, it's not innovative at all, but on the other hand, such a plot was typical of many action films of that era, so I don't think it’s fair to hold that against this film. Kurt Russell as Snake Plissken was intentionally over-the-top in the script, which actually suited his character, so I don’t see a problem there either. However, the execution faltered; at times it felt almost like a theatrical production, which isn’t my cup of tea. The plot moved forward very slowly, and the climax with crossing the booby-trapped bridge felt more amusing than serious. I understand that many people consider it a classic. Maybe I needed to be born at that time; to me, it seemed like a complete brain drain that made less and less sense as the minutes went by. But definitely check it out just for Russell and form your own opinion. I give it 51%. (03/07/2019)