VOD (1)

Plots(1)

The film follows American journalism student Sondra Pransky (Scarlett Johansson), who, while taking part in a show presented by magician Sidney Waterman (Woody Allen) in London, is visited by the ghostly apparition of the recently deceased journalist Joe Strombel (Ian McShane) and told the identity of an alleged serial killer. As Sondra and Sidney try to uncover whether there is any truth to these claims, Sondra begins to fall in love with the suspect, British aristocrat Peter Lyman (Hugh Jackman). (Icon Home Entertainment)

(more)

Videos (1)

Trailer

Reviews (7)

DaViD´82 

all reviews of this user

English In the type of role which gets usually bagged by Woody Allen, Scarlett Johansson maybe tries a bit too hard. But the rest is quite good – at last I don’t mind Allen’s acting, Jackman is great, and Scarlett is at very least gorgeous. The screenplay is average, uninventive and completely predictable. It flies by quite smoothly and a couple of funny scenes work well... But it’s more of a put your feet up movie rather than a “masterpiece" in the good old Woody style we know so well. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English Woody Allen is simply interesting in every form, and even though it's not quite perfect, even though it’s sometimes a little rough around the edges, it's still something he doesn't need to be ashamed of. His acting is more of an echo, and I think it's quite understandable that he has more or less wrapped up his acting career. He chose interesting actors for this film, but the best part of an otherwise fairly average film is the screenplay, which is actually a comedic thriller that works. It's not anything great; some elements are unnecessary, like the entire finale, but the idea is interesting and fairly cleverly executed. ()

Ads

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English This is exactly what a Woody Allen film looks like without his wit, sophisticated insight and creativity. A bunch of stilted dialogue, not even Scarlett Johansson in a swimsuit can save the wtf story and the feeling that this film was actually pointless and about nothing. The ending is like a copy of Match Point, which was still a much better film as a whole ()

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English I'm curious as to why Woody Allen's casual viewers usually consider Scoop a pleasant comedy, while his more regular audience remains disappointed. I stayed somewhere in between. It's no disaster; quite the contrary. Some gags work perfectly and perhaps Woody couldn't have chosen a more appreciative role to bid farewell to his acting for the next few years. That said, in competition with dozens of his other works, I come to the inevitable realization that I have seen the individual components of the story elsewhere and differently. And better. Scarlett Johansson in particular does not fit at all into the role of the main neurotic. Though she delivers some great lines during her arguments with the magician, she has no personal charisma, and above all, no chemistry with the usually flawless Hugh Jackman. ()

Stanislaus 

all reviews of this user

English I see that this film hasn't received much acclaim and there is talk of rip-offs and loss of directorial power. Well, this is only the second Woody Allen film I've seen, so I'm totally blown away by his style. I was impressed, both on the crime and comedy side. Woody Allen shined and I laughed at his monologues and dialogues. And inserting the last journey to eternity wasn't a bad idea either, also a "London ride on the wrong side". It Intrigued me and made me laugh - 75%. ()

Gallery (48)