Screenplay:
Gary WhittaCinematography:
Don BurgessCast:
Denzel Washington, Gary Oldman, Mila Kunis, Ray Stevenson, Jennifer Beals, Evan Jones, Frances de la Tour, Michael Gambon, Tom Waits, Lateef Crowder (more)VOD (2)
Plots(1)
30 years after an unspecified environmental disaster, a lone man, Eli (Denzel Washington), fights his way across the desolate wasteland of a post-apocalyptic America guarding a sacred book called the Book of Eli, which holds the secrets that can bring civilisation back from the brink of destruction and save humankind. His principal threat is despotic town leader Carnegie (Gary Oldman), who will stop at nothing to get hold of the book and use its secrets to take control of society. (Entertainment in Video)
(more)Videos (4)
Reviews (9)
Superb Denzel in a solidly apocalyptic roaming movie. The Hughes brothers’ directing comes across a little abstract, but the world that Eli roams looks damn impressive. The action is really good, even if a little forced, to make sure we don’t get bored on the journey. Mila Kunis is cute with or without her sunglasses. And also San Francisco is one of my favorite cities and seeing it in that condition was worth it.
()
Anyone who wonders why I gave The Book of Eli ****, go see how I rated Costner's The Postman. Okay, don't look for it - I gave it five. The two films have a lot in common. I don't just mean a post-apocalyptic future and one guy mashing his way through the landscape with some sort of goal/mission/whatever. In my opinion, both of them are also very unlucky - because everyone expects a dark story full of action, so logically, when they get (in the case of The Book of Eli) an intimate fairy-tale "walking movie", they stretch their disappointed faces and grumble. Yet from my point of view, The Book of Eli is definitely interesting. And if you want to engage your brain, it will make you think. Technically, this almost two-hour sci-fi film is top-notch - although it's a B-movie of the highest caliber (the shootout on the city street), all the action scenes (yes, there are some) are truly original. Eli's first skirmish, which we see as a static shot of fighting silhouettes, my favorite one-shot shooting of the house, which I will definitely watch many more times... I'm satisfied. The final thought and point are not particularly surprising (well, a little bit - but it doesn't change the fact that the screenwriter needs a slap for how he dealt with some of the situations and actions of some characters), but it doesn't offend either. The actors (Washington and the obviously reveling Oldman) and the music, which made perhaps half of the atmosphere, were pleasing. Four pure stars.
()
It’s not as bad as they say. It has loads of ideas, the actors are great and the brothers in the director’s chair know how move the camera around the action in such that your eyes get an erotic massage at times, which makes the narrative weakness and author’s aimlessness all the more painful. The plot moves mechanically on a previously marked path, without ever developing the nature of a potentially interesting world, whose filth is lost in style, while the climax can’t deliver the punch that the mystery built around Denzel’s character would deserve. It’s watchable, but gratuitous AF. 60%
()
While having faith play the main role doesn’t bother me, I would have imagined it a little differently. I'm glad it wasn't just a simple-minded shooter, though. On the other hand, D. Washington was loaded with too much goodness. Not enough badass lines, cleverness, and conviction. But I still find it touching that he memorized the entire Bible.
()
As an action movie, this is an absolutely awesome ride that I enjoyed. But then there's the problem that this is actually a movie about being made by a group of strong believers who want to convey a very important message. Without the Bible, we're fucked. This is such unbelievable drivel that I almost wanted to cry sadly at the end.
()
Ads