Directed by:
David F. SandbergScreenplay:
Eric HeissererCinematography:
Marc SpicerComposer:
Benjamin WallfischCast:
Teresa Palmer, Maria Bello, Billy Burke, Alexander DiPersia, Emily Alyn Lind, Alicia Vela-Bailey, Gabriel Bateman, Lotta Losten, Andi Osho, Rolando Boyce (more)VOD (4)
Plots(1)
After her husband is killed in a mysterious accident at work, Sophie (Maria Bello) becomes mentally unstable and disturbed and spends much of her time communicating with an imaginary friend that lurks in the darkness. When her behaviour begins to affect her son Martin (Gabriel Bateman), his older sister Rebecca (Teresa Palmer), who remembers their awful home life all too well, offers to shelter him in her apartment to keep him out of harm's way. With the reluctant help of her boyfriend Bret (Alexander DiPersia), Rebecca tries to uncover the mystery behind the entity her mother calls Diana as she researches her mother's past in a mental institution. But it seems Diana has now made Rebecca a target of her attacks when the lights go out. (Warner Bros. Home Entertainment)
(more)Videos (15)
Reviews (9)
A mediocre horror film that doesn't come up with anything new. All the scenes felt vaguely familiar. The one that irritated me the most was the scene where Diana first appeared. If the woman who saw her had flicked the switch a few more times, I would have gladly disposed of her myself. Diana seemed like a fusion of the creature from The Ring, Freddie Krueger, and Edward Scissorhands. The plot was predictable. Instead of building up an atmosphere, the filmmakers concentrated on a constant supply of scares, but at least I got to wrap my Christmas presents in advance. I’m afraid I’ve seen far worse horror movies. What I consider a plus is that it managed to go without brutally murdering 6 to 8 high school/college students.
()
I wouldn't hold out much hope that Lights Out will defend the top spot in horror this year. The trailer struck me as a bit underwhelming, but the film itself is one of the best we've seen in cinemas in the last few years (not counting The Conjuring). David F. Sandberg sets a relentless pace from the opening minutes and rolls out one scare after another, you only have a maximum of 5 minutes to breathe, which is great; the last film to sech such a pace was Drag me to Hell. The idea is very functional, whenever it's dark danger is near, you are worried about all the characters, because their lives are really on the line, and the ghost, even though it's mostly in the dark, is scary, makes disturbing noises, and most importantly is on the scene very often. On the plus side, the half-hour finale with an unexpected twist makes Lights Out an intense 80-minute spectacle that should appeal to anyone who is at least a little bit at home with horror. The Conjuring gives a better impression in terms of story, visuals and setting, whereas Lights Out relies only on scares and it worked. Story 6/10, Atmosphere 9/10, Gore 4/10, Visuals 7/10, Action 8/10, Suspense 9/10, Humour 3/10. Entertainment 8/10, Scares 9/10. 85%.
()
I can’t ask more from mainstream horror. A very simple plot that doesn’t waste much time and goes straight to what matters, scaring. The idea originally used in Sandberg’s short is varied again and again, and it still works. The ghost or monster is hidden in the dark for most of the time, but even when you can see more of it by the end, it doesn’t lose much of its horror. The “friend’s” ghost backstory that I dreaded in the trailer is delivered elegantly and it actually sounds a little disturbing. But what sets this film above its mainstream competition are the characters and their relationships. Everyone is nice or at least you can understand their behaviour. But, most importantly, they aren’t one-dimensional figures devoid of personality and, already from the beginning, the film works with relationships that are not totally banal. I won’t say that it delivers some nuanced psychological picture, but it still goes a lot further than the overrated Conjuring. Although Lights Out is basically an intimate horror movie, for me it’s better than Wan’s bigger works. The characters are under a real threat. Technically it is comparable to the premier league. It’s unlikely to be the best of the year (that one already appears regularly in indie waters), but it’s certainly the best mainstream horror flick in recent years. I will gladly watch it again. 9/10
()
It’s a shame that this movie follows the genre template too closely, working with overused clichés, and has the runtime
of a Leslie Nielsen comedy. And it’s too bad that the characters are underdeveloped. The monster Diane has much
greater potential, as she is scarier than anything from James Wan’s masterpieces. The scenes with her escalate from
continuous goose bumps to a very intense climax.
()
You can't shine a light. We’ve probably never had a similarly intense and original scare in cinemas, and in today's horror competition, it's hard to imagine a more effective way to make the audience's return home through darkened streets as unpleasant as possible. It goes full speed ahead from the start and, without any unnecessary talk, we are served an intelligent horror plot spiced up with such a thick atmosphere and such a scary monster that I would grunt with joy if I didn't have my vocal cords clenched with nervousness. Plus the flawless escalation, thanks to which the evil doesn't stop scaring even towards the end, the reasonable runtime and of course the absolutely disarming beauty of Terasa Palmer, thanks to whom I didn't breathe even in the less tense scenes. Pointless to complain and whine, that's all we can ask for.
()
Ads