The Cloverfield Paradox

The Cloverfield Paradox tries to be a smart film, but fails on more than one front. You can never have too many alternate reality films, but in this case I found it bland and unpolished. I was expecting a larger dose of suspense and action from a film set on a spaceship that suddenly finds itself in trouble. On the other hand, the dramatic line didn't work either (Ava and her family). In many ways, the film is similar to Life and Aliens, but qualitatively it is quite different. As a result, you sense an obvious yet untapped potential. (04/04/2020)

The longer I think about it, the more The Cloverfield Paradox resembles an idea that simply didn't work out. An attempt that originally wanted to be part of an ambitious series but somewhere halfway through falls short of that intention. The resulting connection is almost an insult to the viewer because this time there are no surprising twists, turning clichés upside down, or even deepening familiar genre boundaries. The earthly storyline jumps from nothing to nothing, and the main attraction, the space part, doesn't come close to any of its thematic counterparts (Sunshine, Prometheus, Life) and is most notable for Chris O'Dowd once again playing Chris O'Dowd, which is as striking as it is liberating. Cloverfield was supposed to be an original series that turned expectations upside down. I don't understand why, a decade later, after the first film crushed me months in advance, its development is desperately clueless. (06/02/2018)

It’s terribly unfocused. The first half is satisfying overall – you can see the production values, the actors are decent and there are a couple of relatively interesting ideas. Unfortunately, it ends up strangely splitting into individual episodes where there’s always someone whose job is to scream, all while running around in the generic interiors of a spaceship. In a better written film, the final conflict between the astronauts of the first and second dimensions could have been a central premise, the basis of a fantastic dilemma and a suffocating atmosphere. But not in this film, which carefully walks around the interesting themes. The connection with Cloverfield is a decent base, but not very well delivered. I’m rating it at about 50%, I’m disappointed with the resulting quality of the film, though that could have been expected given the delays and the release straight to Netflix. (06/02/2018)

Did I really see it, or just dreamed it? The Cloverfield Paradox is the space version of The Room that flies with its silliness to somewhere beyond the boundaries of tastelessness, where it shakes hands with Robot Monster, Turkish Star Wars before heading to infinity. Julius Onah, along with the writers, is the new Tommy Wiseau. I believe that in a few years this will be a stellar addition to The Shockproof Film Festival, and with the help of alcohol it could be an interesting group experience, like when the audience of The Room bombards the screen with plastic spoons during midnight screenings. Hell, yeah! (26/03/2018)

The world revolving around the Cloverfield monster fascinates me. The first film brought a fresh and intense action experience, while the second delivered a gripping thriller with an atmosphere that was almost palpable. The third installment appeared out of nowhere, and I wasn’t expecting it, which made it even more surprising. But honestly, I was expecting a much more intense film. The space setting was quite good, but the script sometimes felt almost absurd. The cast might not be full of big names (except for Daniel Brühl), but don’t be fooled. Although I didn’t expect to form any attachment to the characters, I did. The story takes place in 2028 and mainly revolves around jumping from one dimension to another and the subsequent effects. It had a more than decent pace (though it fell into the classic slasher mode in the second half), the ship’s environment felt quite claustrophobic, and the visual effects could be considered above average. However, one might wonder why this belongs in the same category as the previous two Cloverfield films. If there weren’t any hints (and I’m not just talking about the ending, which I’m still unsure about), you might not categorize it that way. I’d mark that as the film’s biggest drawback, along with the plot holes. Otherwise, the film was entertaining; the idea with the hand wasn’t bad (though the hand skittering across the floor seemed ridiculous). Objectively, it deserves a solid three stars, but due to the somewhat inexplicable low rating here, I’m giving it a weaker four. 70%. (13/02/2018)