Nightmare Alley

I’m not fond of carnivals from the first half of the 20th century, with their bizarreness, the way their tormented animals and boasted about the deformity of disabled people, but the setting in the late 1930s and early 1940s suits me. However, I feel that the story and its plot arc is not so substantial to justify the enormous runtime. I would have cut the beginning at the carnival by half, maybe more, and nothing would have happened, leaving Bradley and Rooney Mara's reunion and , for the final (very funny, by the way) twist, the important monologue of the the demonic Willem Dafoe about how they recruit human scum to play the role of renegades who are locked permanently in a cage and eat chickens alive. On the other hand, if I were Del Toro I'd focus more on the intrigue in the big city, its grimness and depravity, because Cate Blanchett is a great femme fatale and the sparks between her and Bradley are electrifying. Overall, I enjoyed it, but a pair of scissors for the editor would have been really nice. But it's hard when you consider how much del Toro loves the bizarreness of the old fairs and carnivals, he must have felt like a kid in a candy store in their backdrop. (17/06/2022)

The critics are singing the praises, but I wonder if it's not a bit of a pose. I like Guillermo del Toro, but it turns out I think it's only within the fantasy genre. Nightmare Alley is nothing more than a drawn out 150 minute tedious borefest with some pretty nice sets and fine actors, but the rest of it is very bad. The first hour is quite watchable and offers solid visuals led by a traveling circus and freak show, but once the plot moves forward in time, del Toro started to lose me until he lost me completely towards the end. Plot-wise, there's not much to stand on and the entire runtime drags on in stereotype form without any major emotion, action or suspense and with each passing minute you just wait for the film to actually start, only to find out towards the end that it just hasn't. And then I don't know what to rate - big names are not enough to be satisfied. (14/02/2022)

This time, form wins over content, as the atmosphere is superb and the direction is meticulously detailed, but the story didn't quite grab me by the heart. The first (roughly) circus half was great, and since I didn't know anything about the plot (even the short official distributor blurb here is actually a spoiler), I was curious to see where it was all going. Unfortunately, this eventually led to a not so interesting second and third act, in which almost everything was suddenly expected, including the beautifully vicious ending. I'm a bit disappointed because I really like Guillermo Del Toro and he got a dream cast for Nightmare Alley, but at the same time I'm not too disappointed. P.S.. Bradley Cooper's hero is a downright Lovecraftian character, and I' d like to see some of that Cthulhu next time. (30/01/2022)

An epochal experience. It's very nice that we get such an ideal film even in the cloud of this year's Oscar nominations. Great stuff is drawn from William Lindsay Gresham's novel "Nightmare Alley" (1946), which had already proven to be a novelty when it was first adapted in 1947. Stylistically, it is a treat with classic film punctuation, the production design is absolutely art deco and the decadence of a circus setting and a wicked big city are combined. What more could you want? The acting roles, which are a given: Cooper, Blanchett, Dafoe, Mara, Collette... A decade earlier, Water for Elephants was a similar treat. And on TV, maybe Season 4 of AHS or the unfinished HBO series Carnivàle. (04/04/2022)

A magical neo-noir thriller by Guillermo del Toro! Nightmare Alley isn't for mainstream audiences and you need to be in the mood for it, but if you're properly tuned in like me, you're in for an awesome magical movie experience. The film benefits a lot from a perfect cast, with Bradley Cooper in the lead and Cate Blanchett also in a very prominent role of her career (the rest of the characters have less space, but Willem Dafoe, Toni Collette and Ron Perlman are good, too). The first hour was very close and appealing to me, set in a post war circus, a setting I like a lot and here they portray very nicely what goes on behind the curtain (all the shenanigans). The story of the wild man is awesome, it has quite a disturbing and sultry atmosphere. Visually it's absolutely breathtaking to the point of being mesmerizing, some of the shots will make want to pause the film and take a picture (Guillermo is a god in visual styling). The second half goes in a different direction, and I won't say which one, but it definitely builds up decently, the tension and uncertainty builds up and the finale is quite uncompromisingly ironic. The film is two and a half hours long and has a slower pace, so impatient viewers will probably fall asleep or give up on it, but I surprisingly stared open-mouthed and thoroughly enjoyed the whole thing. It's a perfect example of manipulation, psychology, scamming and deception with a nice period setting, magical atmosphere, excellent actors, stunning visuals and well written dialogue. The scene where the older gentleman explains to Bradley the trick of manipulating people with the right words- is great. I took away a lesson from the movie, I feel I was on top of things and it's definitely something to debate with friends for half an hour, so very good for me. Story 4/5, Action 2/5, Humor 0/5, Violence 2/5, Fun 4/5 Music 4/5, Visuals 5/5, Atmosphere 4/5, Suspense 3/5, Emotion 3/5, Actors 4/5. 8/10. (25/03/2022)